Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size
От | wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m12PKVK-0003kGC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > Removing the labels would actually save code in readfuncs.c, which > > wouldn't have to skip over them. In outfuncs.c, we could either > > have every node-writing subroutine know about two output modes, or > > make a post-pass that strips anything that looks like a field label. > > The latter would be less maintenance work in the long run. > > > > Comments? > > If you could keep the labels just for EXPLAIN, go for it. Not right now, put it onto TODO for after 7.0. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: