Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on
От | wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m11zyG4-0003kIC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Dare I suggest > that we should declare feature freeze *now*, and concentrate on bug > fixes only for the next six weeks? If not, what features are on the > near horizon? Only if the implementation of the temp file buffered deferred trigger event queue isn't considered a feature, and after I committed the catalog changes I need to go on with LONG quietly. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: