Re: [HACKERS] LONG
От | wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] LONG |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m11xGwt-0003kGC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] LONG (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] LONG
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > I disagree. By moving to another table, we don't have non-standard > tuples in the main table. We can create normal tuples in the long* > table, of identical format, and access them just like normal tuples. > Having special long tuples in the main table that don't follow the > format of the other tuples it a certain mess. The long* tables also > move the long data out of the main table so it is not accessed in > sequential scans. Why keep them in the main table? More ugly and complicated (especially for VACUUM) seems to me, the we need an index on these nonstandard tuples, that doesn't see the standard ones, while the regular indices ignore the new long tuples. At least if we want to delay reading of long values until they're explicitly requested. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: