Re: [HACKERS] TLE subselects (was: Raising funds for PostgreSQL)

Tom Lane wrote:

> wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) writes:
>
> > Uh,
> >     who did the latter one?
>
> >     So I assume it's not implemented in the form I outlined - the
> >     subselecting  range  table  entry. I'll take a look at it the
> >     next  days  and  maybe  complain  about  that  change  if  it
> >     interferes  with  the  needs  of  the  rule  system  to  make
> >     aggregate, distinct, group by, sort  by  and  all  the  other
> >     (long wanted) view stuff possible.
>
> I don't believe this has anything to do with subselects as range
> table entries.  That facility will be quite separate from subselects
> in expressions, no?

Now that you say it...

    Yes, they are separate. They don't interfere.

    Thank's for the *slap* - sometimes I need that :-).


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #