Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL
От | wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m11vA6x-0003kGC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL
Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Kyle Bateman <kyle@actarg.com> writes: > > [ wish list ] > > - Get rid of size restrictions on queries (16K) > > - Could a subquery be included in the target list of a query > > select a,(select b from c) from d where e = f; > > (Not sure if this one is even standard SQL.) > > FWIW, the above two things are already done in current sources. Uh, who did the latter one? Just running some qry through psql I see that it works partially. Especially I see a ExecSetParamPlan: more than one tuple returned by expression subselect So I assume it's not implemented in the form I outlined - the subselecting range table entry. I'll take a look at it the next days and maybe complain about that change if it interferes with the needs of the rule system to make aggregate, distinct, group by, sort by and all the other (long wanted) view stuff possible. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: