Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Column name's length

Tom Lane wrote:

> >     I like it.
>
> Perhaps eventually we should wind up using names like "pg_pkey_8381292"
> but I think this ought to wait until the system retains an explicit
> representation of the relationship between these indexes/sequences and
> the owning table, and until we think through the consequences for
> pg_dump.  For now we had better stick to unprivileged names.

    Of  course!  I  didn't  meant  to do anything on it for v6.5.
    Implementing automatic sequence deletion if they got  created
    due  to serial fields is definitely feature. And I agree that
    all the odds and ends have to get discussed down first.


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #