Re: [HACKERS] Re: map
От | jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: map |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m10Kpw1-000EBSC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: map (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: map
Re: [HACKERS] Re: map |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > >> background is not white --- there's a white ring around each > > >> continent thanks to poor antialiasing. > > > > > We force a cream background for that page, no? > > > > It's gray on my browser (Netscape 4.0something). Even if it were > > cream, the background of the gif is *white* not cream, so the ring > > would still be there (maybe a little harder to see though). > > > > Since GIF hasn't got partial transparency, you can't do real > > antialiasing without making the background colors match. > > You're probably best off not using transparency at all, unless > > you forget about antialiasing. (Or is it antialiasing that's > > leaving the near-white pixels there? Maybe it's just sloppy drawing > > of the border of the transparent region?) > > I am confused. I don't even know what anti-aliasing is. Nor do I > understand why you get a grey background. I am running Netscape 4.5, > and I see the background of all the pages as off-white. If the <BODY> doesn't define a background, Netscape uses it's (configurable) default one. So your config say's white (why not slategray?). Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: