Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k
От | darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m0zWR3e-0000emC@druid.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k
Re: [HACKERS] Re: y2k |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thus spake Bruce Momjian > I have added a mention to the FAQ on the web site, saying the we are Y2K > compliant. Er, is that such a good idea? I might stick my neck out if I am being paid for it but I don't know that I would want lawyers arguing over exactly what constitutes "Y2K compliant." Sure, we are but that won't stop ambulance ch^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hlawyers from causing us grief. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: