Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind
От | darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m0zVLTy-0000emC@druid.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind ("Taral" <taral@mail.utexas.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thus spake Taral > Can't we just use a CONSTRAINT where a host address is expected? That sounds > easier than setting up two different types to me... The constraint would be pretty complicated and it doesn't handle the different output rules. Don't worry. After things settle down we'll fold things together so that there is two input wrapper functions and everything else will be handled by the same functions so you won't hardly know the difference. I too originally thought there should be one type but Paul has convinced me otherwise. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: