Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem
От | jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m0zCFah-000EBPC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Jan, this is great. It would have taken me a long time to find this. > Why my platform did not fail is a real mystery. > > Patch applied. I am looking at the vacuum problem now. > > -- > Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue Bruce, Seems that the addresses that where assigned when pg_internal.init is created (don't know exactly when this happens) are the same as they should be later (when it is read into). I absolutely don't know why they are different between these two situations at all, it are all addresses from builtin functions, and the postgres image is allways the same one. So I'm a little confused about it. But these are the facts gdb told me. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: