Re: [HACKERS] Here it is - view permissions]
От | orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de!wieck@sapserv.debis.de |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Here it is - view permissions] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | m0y6ydG-000BFRC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Here it is - view permissions] (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Why does views default to 'select' permission for 'public'? > > > > I think most people will never think of the possibility that others > > > > will be able to SELECT their data through views. > > > > Should not 'create view' at least print a NOTICE about this? > > > > > > Considering how much security we are putting around everything > > > else, is it unreasonably to have both 'create view'/'create table' default > > > to 'revoke all' to public, and 'grant all' to owner? > > > > Most commercial databases don't do this. > > Well, just checked with Wayne (My Oracle Guru) and in Oracle, > everything is private by default, and you open it up as required/desired > to other ppl... Microsoft SQL server too defaults to private and requires explicit GRANT for public. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: