Re: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output
От | David Christensen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output |
Дата | |
Msg-id | lz7di1vqwx.fsf@veeddrois.attlocal.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes: > David Christensen <david.christensen@crunchydata.com> writes: >> Enclosed is the patch to change the return type to numeric, as well as one for expanding units to >> add PB and EB. > > Can we really get away with changing the return type? That would > by no stretch of the imagination be free; one could expect breakage > of a few user views, for example. Hmm, that's a good point, and we can't really make the return type polymorphic (being as there isn't a source type of the given return value). > Independently of that, I'm pretty much -1 on going further than PB. > Even if the additional abbreviations you mention are actually recognized > standards, I think not that many people are familiar with them, and such > input is way more likely to be a typo than intended data. If we do go ahead and restrict the expansion to just PB, the return value of pg_size_bytes() would still support up to 8192 PB before running into range limitations. I assume it's not worth creating a pg_size_bytes_numeric() with the full range of supported units, but that is presumably an option as well. Best, David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: