Re: Generalized edit function?
От | fork |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Generalized edit function? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | loom.20110227T013706-502@post.gmane.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Generalized edit function? (fork <forkandwait@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Generalized edit function?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas <at> gmail.com> writes: > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Josh Berkus <josh <at> agliodbs.com> wrote: > > Anyway, if it's ASCII-only, that's a guaranteed way to make sure it > > isn't taken seriously. > > Pre-9.1 levenshtein is ASCII-only, and I think some of the other stuff > in contrib/fuzzystrmatch still is. I am only looking at 9.0.3 for levenshtein, so I don't have any thoughts yet on multi-byteness so far. I will have to figure out the multibyte character work once I get the basic algorithm working -- any thoughts on that? Any pitfalls in porting? > So I have some sympathy with the OP's desire not to burden himself > with the non-ASCII case if he doesn't need it for his application, > but > I also agree with your point that we probably wouldn't accept code > into contrib that doesn't. Good to know. I will try to avoid backing myself into an ascii corner.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: