Re: Why JDBC 1?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Rene Pijlman
Тема Re: Why JDBC 1?
Дата
Msg-id lisfptov9m4vbe2aq1kkfl9eb9fjfduf7a@4ax.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why JDBC 1?  (Dave Cramer <Dave@micro-automation.net>)
Ответы Re: Why JDBC 1?
Список pgsql-jdbc
On 04 Sep 2001 13:22:33 -0400, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> Isn't the JDBC 2 driver also an implementation of JDBC 1?
>Yes, it is, but many of the libraries, and methods which are used in
>version 2 of the driver aren't available in jdk1 so it won't compile or
>run.

Ah, I see. And I assume we support JDBC 1 for applets that need
to run in popular browsers with a JVM 1.

Has it been discussed before when and how we can stop
maintaining two versions?

Are people really still using JDBC 1?

Regards,
René Pijlman <rene@lab.applinet.nl>

В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rene Pijlman
Дата:
Сообщение: Fix for 2 test cases of JDBC test suite
Следующее
От: "Dave Cramer"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: error - NOTICE: current transaction...MORE DETAIL...