Re: One PostgreSQL server for multiple apps?
От | Thomas Kellerer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: One PostgreSQL server for multiple apps? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | lediv8$afp$1@ger.gmane.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: One PostgreSQL server for multiple apps? (Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
Pandu Poluan wrote on 23.02.2014 16:37: > I have been reading around, and it seems (CMIIW) that in PostgreSQL, > a 'database' is similar to a SQL Server instance, while to create > separate databases within an 'instance', I need to create 'schemas'. > > Am I reading this right? I don't think so. "Databases" in SQL Server and Postgres are very similar. The main difference is that in Postgres you can not do cross-database queries. The schema concept inside a single database is more or less the same thing if we are talking about SQL Server 2008 and later. I'm not familiar with SQL Server's instance concept but I would consider a Postgres "instance" a separate data directory("cluster") with it's own set of processes listening on it's own port. > There is another question, is it possible to limit the resources used > by separate instances/databases so that different apps don't start to > step on each others' toes? No, I don't think this is currently possible with Postgres
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: