Re: planet "top posters" section
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: planet "top posters" section |
Дата | |
Msg-id | l2u937d27e11004190029v508b21barf0a377e7bf0a12a0@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: planet "top posters" section (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: planet "top posters" section
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:56 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Robert Treat > <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: >> Personally I think the top teams thing has caused more trouble/confusion than >> any benefit it has produced, and at this point I think it could be dumped, and >> with that our top 20 would become much more reasonable looking. imho. > > That'd be fine with me, too, as would any of the other suggestions so > far offered. I disagree - I like the teams feature. How about just listing top posters and top teams separately, and not including the people under each team. Maybe something like Top posters ----------------- Robert Treat (OmniTI) - 5 Andreas Scherbaum - 5 Magnus Hagander - 4 Dave Page (EnterpriseDB) -2 Bruce Momjian (EnterpriseDB) - 2 Top teams ---------------- OmniTI - 5 EnterpriseDB - 4 My only concern with that is that the poster names could become quite long. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: