Re: DRAFT beta release announcement
| От | Scott Mead |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: DRAFT beta release announcement |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | l2ld3ab2ec81004280637w9bd34a5cv64ae74fcea5a4406@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: DRAFT beta release announcement (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
On 4/27/10 2:47 PM, Chris Browne wrote:I'd really prefer something that fits into a bullet without wrapping.
> jd@commandprompt.com ("Joshua D. Drake") writes:
>>> * The DO() statement, allowing users to execute ad-hoc procedural statements
>> DO() support, allowing for inline? execution of procedural statements.
>>
>> Not quite sure about this one. I don't like the word ad-hoc. Dynamic?
>
> Hmm. How about...
>
> DO() enables users to execute procedural statements without requiring
> assigning function names.
>
> That's clearer, though a bit wordier.
+1 for anonymous blocks. It's a common term in the industry, and may raise more eyebrows than 'ad-hoc' or 'dynamic'
--Scott
Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: