Re: Win32 timezone matching
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Win32 timezone matching |
Дата | |
Msg-id | k2z9837222c1004070331k7756ca19q3323aa1afdee69d2@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Win32 timezone matching (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Win32 timezone matching
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 00:48, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 00:02, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Oh, another thought here: what is the effect of the combination of this >>> with your other proposal to add more timezones to the list? > >> [ none ] > > Ah, right, I hadn't looked closely at the logic before. Still have > two comments though: > > * There are other error conditions that cause "break"s in that loop. > Should we change the others? The only other error condition is if we find a key but can't open it. That indicates something that's *seriously* wrong, so I'm inclined to keep that one. The other two break statements are actually for when we *find* a match, so they just indicate that we pick the first match that we find. > * There is a comment at the head of win32_tzmap[] explaining where the > data came from; you need to update that. Right. -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: