Re: [PATCH v4] GSSAPI encryption support
От | Robbie Harwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH v4] GSSAPI encryption support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | jlglh6r5b5l.fsf@thriss.redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH v4] GSSAPI encryption support (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH v4] GSSAPI encryption support
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> - The GSSAPI authentication code has been moved without modification. >> In doing so, the temptation to modify it (flags, error checking, that >> big comment at the top about things from Athena, etc.) is very large. >> I do not know whether these changes are best suited to another patch >> in this series or should be reviewed separately. I am also hesitant >> to add things beyond the core before I am told this is the right >> approach. > > I would recommend a different patch if code needs to be moved around. > The move may make sense taken as an independent piece of the > integration. Sorry, are you suggesting separate patch for moving the GSS auth code, or separate patch for changes to said code? I am happy to move it if so, just want to be sure. > + * Portions Copyright (c) 2015-2016, Red Hat, Inc. > + * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2016, PostgreSQL Global Development Group > I think that this part may be a problem... Not sure the feeling of the > others regarding additional copyright notices. Good catch. That's an accident (force of habit). Since I'm pretty sure this version won't be merged anyway, I'll drop it from the next one. > It would be good to add that to the next CF, I will be happy to get a > look at it. Sounds good. Thanks for looking at it!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: