Re: Background fsck
От | Ivan Voras |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Background fsck |
Дата | |
Msg-id | inmnju$rcn$1@dough.gmane.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Background fsck (Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta@wp.pl>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 08/04/2011 07:55, Ireneusz Pluta wrote: > Achilleas Mantzios wrote: >> >> In anyway, having FreeBSD to fsck, (background or not) should not >> happen. And the problem >> becomes bigger when cheap SATA drives will cheat about their write >> cache being flushed to the disk. >> So in the common case with cheap hardware, it is wise to have a UPS >> connected and being monitored >> by the system. >> > > It's not lack of UPS. Power issues are taken care of here. It's a buggy > 3ware controller which hangs the machine ocassionally and the only way > to have it come back is to power cycle, hard reset is not enough. So just to summarize your position: you think it is ok to run a database on a buggy disk controller but are afraid of problems with normal OS utilities? :) You are of course free to do whatever you want but it seems odd :)
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: