Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
От | Torsten Zühlsdorff |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | iige7c$ctl$1@news.eternal-september.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... (Mladen Gogala <mladen.gogala@vmsinfo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Mladen Gogala schrieb: > Well, the problem will not go away. As I've said before, all other > databases have that feature and none of the reasons listed here > convinced me that everybody else has a crappy optimizer. The problem > may go away altogether if people stop using PostgreSQL. A common problem of programmers is, that they want a solution they already know for a problem they already know, even if it is the worst solution the can choose. There are so many possibilities to solve a given problem and you even have time to do this before your application get released. Also: if you rely so heavily on hints, then use a database which supports hints. A basic mantra in every training i have given is: use the tool/technic/persons which fits best for the needs of the project. There are many databases out there - choose for every project the one, which fits best! Greetings from Germany, Torsten -- http://www.dddbl.de - ein Datenbank-Layer, der die Arbeit mit 8 verschiedenen Datenbanksystemen abstrahiert, Queries von Applikationen trennt und automatisch die Query-Ergebnisse auswerten kann.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: