Re: perltidy
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: perltidy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | i2o9837222c1004190931t66323f53l8370ac3645ebe2d5@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: perltidy (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: perltidy
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 18:24, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > On mån, 2010-04-19 at 17:02 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> The MSVC scripts currently have a "perltidy coding style" so we run >> perltidy with a specific set of arguments to format the code. (This is >> in the README). Kind of like pgindent. >> >> Should we be doing this on all the perlscripts we use? >> >> And if we do, we should obviously use the same one everywhere - >> probably just use the one we have for the msvc stuff today. Anything >> in particular about that one that people hate? > > I tried it on create_help.pl and couldn't find a good combination of > options that I liked. It either adds too much whitespace or removes too > much, or both. Maybe that can be fined tuned. I wouldn't want to use > the -bl option; it's not a typical Perl style. I doubt we're ever going to find a style taht everybody likes. Heck, everybody certainly don't like our C style. We just need to decide on one that's good enough and then go with it. I don't recall exactly why -bl was added to the msvc style, but probably to make it look more like our C code ;) I don't care too much exactly *what* we do, but I think we should have a common style... -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: