Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 beta 3 release announcement
От | Thomas Kellerer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 beta 3 release announcement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | i1fsig$pgc$1@dough.gmane.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 beta 3 release announcement (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 beta 3 release announcement
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Bruce Momjian wrote on 12.07.2010 21:34: > Thom Brown wrote: >> Could someone clarify the info in this paragraph: >> >> "Note that, due to a system catalog change, an initdb and database >> reload will be required for upgrading from 9.0Beta1. We encourage >> users to use this opportunity to test pg_upgrade for the upgrade from >> Beta2 or an earlier version of 9.0. Please report your results." >> >> This suggests that the system catalog change only occurred in Beta2, >> not Beta3. So if that's the case, why would I want to test pg_upgrade >> going from Beta2 to Beta3 if they use the same system catalog layout? > > Yes, this is wrong. It should be "We encourage users to use this > opportunity to test pg_upgrade for the upgrade from Beta1 or an earlier > version of 9.0. Please report your results." However, I see the beta3 > release notes are now on the web site so it seems too late to fix this. I'm a bit confused that pg_upgrade is "advertised" in this way, but is "hidden" in the manual under "additionally suppliedmodules". If I was a new user, I would look in the administration chapter for any reference on how to do in-place upgrades. Is there any reason why pg_upgrade is not documented in the "main" manual? Regards Thomas
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: