Re: SSD + RAID
От | Ivan Voras |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SSD + RAID |
Дата | |
Msg-id | hdm1j4$pmf$1@ger.gmane.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SSD + RAID (Lists <lists@on-track.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: SSD + RAID
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Lists wrote: > Laszlo Nagy wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm about to buy SSD drive(s) for a database. For decision making, I >> used this tech report: >> >> http://techreport.com/articles.x/16255/9 >> http://techreport.com/articles.x/16255/10 >> >> Here are my concerns: >> >> * I need at least 32GB disk space. So DRAM based SSD is not a real >> option. I would have to buy 8x4GB memory, costs a fortune. And >> then it would still not have redundancy. >> * I could buy two X25-E drives and have 32GB disk space, and some >> redundancy. This would cost about $1600, not counting the RAID >> controller. It is on the edge. > This was the solution I went with (4 drives in a raid 10 actually). Not > a cheap solution, but the performance is amazing. I've came across this article: http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/02/ssd-xfs-lvm-fsync-write-cache-barrier-and-lost-transactions/ It's from a Linux MySQL user so it's a bit confusing but it looks like he has some reservations about performance vs reliability of the Intel drives - apparently they have their own write cache and when it's disabled performance drops sharply.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: