Re: FW: RETURNING in stored procedure
От | Jasen Betts |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FW: RETURNING in stored procedure |
Дата | |
Msg-id | gvbbsc$g72$1@reversiblemaps.ath.cx обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | FW: RETURNING in stored procedure ("Mehrotra, Abhinav (GE Healthcare)" <Abhinav.Mehrotra@ge.com>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
On 2009-05-23, Leif B. Kristensen <leif@solumslekt.org> wrote: > On Saturday 23. May 2009, Jasen Betts wrote: >>On 2009-05-22, Mehrotra, Abhinav (GE Healthcare) ><Abhinav.Mehrotra@ge.com> wrote: >>>>Val:= insert into temp("hello") RETURNING seq; >> >>postgres seems to translate anything after a := into a select, >>(something I often exploit) >> >>thus you can do >> >> var := expression FROM table_name WHERE condition_expression ; >> >>etc. >> >>but INSERT-RETURNING isn't treated like an expression, or like a >>query so it doesn't work as above. >> >>> INSERT INTO temp("hello") RETURNING seq INTO val; >> >>yeah. > > I still think that OP's syntax is the most intuitive one, and IMO it > should be possible to do variable assignments this way in plpgsql from > RETURNING values. It's the «normal» way of doing assignments in almost > every other computer language that I know of. I agree, however Insert...returning can't be used as a subquery. which is effectively what he was doing. I'm not sure why it can't be used as a subquery.
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: