Re: Which SQL is the best for servers?
| От | Jerry Stuckle |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Which SQL is the best for servers? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | gneaem$bbs$2@news.motzarella.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Which SQL is the best for servers? (Geoff Muldoon <geoff.muldoon@trap.gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Geoff Muldoon wrote: > Jerry Stuckle says... > >>>>>>> The server would run Linux or one of the BSD variant >>>>>> You also missed DB2, SQL Server and several others. >>>>> Scrap MSSQL Server as a candidate given the above O/S requirement. > >>>> The OS should be picked based on the requirements of the database and >>>> rest of the system, not vice versa. >>> In an ideal world, yes. > >>> My comments were simply based on the OPs restriction on O/S. There may be >>> valid non-ideal-world reasons for that restriction. > >> More than just ideal world. The higher the requirements, the more >> important it is. And he has some pretty high requirements. > > No wanting to get into a philosophical argument, but ... > > Sometimes restrictions are imposed. Hopefully these will NOT conflict > with the requirements, and in the OP's case there is still acceptable > remaining flexibility of choice. > > My upcoming project will have the RDBMS mandated. I can live with that, > because the option imposed on me can more than comfortably handle the > requirements. Is this ideal? No. Are the motives for this imposed > restriction reasonable in this case? Yes. > > Geoff M If artificial restrictions which affect the success of the project are imposed, then it's time to get rid of those restrictions. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle JDS Computer Training Corp. jstucklex@attglobal.net ==================
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: