Re: PERSISTANT PREPARE (another point of view)

Milan Oparnica wrote:
> 
> It's simply to complicated to return recordsets through server-side 
> stored procedures. They are obviously designed to do complex data 
> manipulation, returning few output variables informing the caller about 
> final results. Returning records through sets of user-defined-types is 
> memory and performance waste (please see my previous post as reply to 
> Steve for more details). Plus it's hard to maintain and make 
> improvements to such a system. I hate to see 800 user types made for 
> every query we made as stored procedure.

Is this topic completely out of scope in Postgre ?
If I'm missing something too obvious or too important, please let me 
know what.

I run over and over through internet and Postgre documentation and still 
found nothing.

Is there a better place to communicate with Postgre developers ?

Sincerely,

Milan Oparnica