Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Forbid using pg_xlogfile_name() and pg_xlogfile_name_offset()
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Forbid using pg_xlogfile_name() and pg_xlogfile_name_offset() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | g2p3f0b79eb1004071915ma05e32cgd73fa7ffcbaba8c3@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Forbid using pg_xlogfile_name() and pg_xlogfile_name_offset() (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Forbid using pg_xlogfile_name() and pg_xlogfile_name_offset()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > This commit is a stop-gap solution until we figure out what exactly to > do about that. Masao-san wrote a patch that included the TLI in the > string returned by pg_last_xlog_receive/replay_location() (see > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/3f0b79eb1003030603ibd0cbadjebb09fa4249304ba@mail.gmail.com > and > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/3f0b79eb1003300214r6cf98c46tc9be5d563ccf48db@mail.gmail.com), > but it still wasn't clear it did the right thing in corner-cases where > the TLI changes. Using GetRecoveryTargetTLI() for the tli returned by > pg_last_receive_location() seems bogus, at least. Why? The tli of the last WAL record received is always the recovery target tli currently. So using GetRecoveryTargetTLI() for pg_last_xlog_receive_location() seems OK for me. Am I missing something? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: