Re: attempted to lock invisible tuple - PG 8.4.1
От | Stuart Bishop |
---|---|
Тема | Re: attempted to lock invisible tuple - PG 8.4.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | g0g9sur7hrudzo9ar3UYAxe124vaj_firegpg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: attempted to lock invisible tuple - PG 8.4.1 (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: attempted to lock invisible tuple - PG 8.4.1
Re: attempted to lock invisible tuple - PG 8.4.1 |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Stuart Bishop wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Alban Hertroys >> <dalroi@solfertje.student.utwente.nl> wrote: > >> > A similar issue was discussed just recently here: >> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2009-09/msg01219.php >> > >> > That issue involved cursors though (and a serializable isolation level, but >> > you have that). Do you have any triggers that use cursors on the table that >> > the update fails for? >> >> There is a trigger on that table, and it is certainly the culprit as >> can be seen here (different table, same trigger): > > I don't think the committed patch touches anything involved in what > you're testing, but if you could grab CVS tip from the 8.4 branch (or > the snapshot from ftp.postgresql.org:/pub/snapshot/stable/8.4 ) and give > it a try, that'd be great. I trigger the same error with a freshly built snapshot. -- Stuart Bishop <stuart@stuartbishop.net> http://www.stuartbishop.net/
Вложения
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: