Re: sequence scan, but indexed tables
От | Cserna Zsolt |
---|---|
Тема | Re: sequence scan, but indexed tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | freemail.20020622153354.85651@fm6.freemail.hu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | sequence scan, but indexed tables (csernazs@freemail.hu (Cserna Zsolt)) |
Ответы |
Re: sequence scan, but indexed tables
|
Список | pgsql-general |
[...] > Then I'd say the planner is making the right decision. Yes, the cost is cool, if I turn off enable_hashjoin, I get a very hight cost. But the runtime is smaller (in a bigger query, which have around 20 row on output, and 2-3 subselect and 3-4 join). > > I have postgresql 7.0.3 running on Debian GNU/Linux i386. > > You do realize that version is quite ancient? So, upgrade is strongly recommended? :) Debian package is not so good, the backup script doesn't work (in an earlier debian package). I tried to backup the database (I have daily backup) before upgrading, but restoring from this was too hard for me, because the postgres server didn't started (he/she thinks I haven't got backup :). Regards, and thank you, Zsolt
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: