Re: pgsql: Declare assorted array functions using anycompatible not anyelem
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Declare assorted array functions using anycompatible not anyelem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | fff35eb5-765c-3e60-3a2a-45ba5f88777d@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pgsql: Declare assorted array functions using anycompatible not anyelem (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Declare assorted array functions using anycompatible not anyelem
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
On 11/4/20 4:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Declare assorted array functions using anycompatible not anyelement. > > Convert array_append, array_prepend, array_cat, array_position, > array_positions, array_remove, array_replace, and width_bucket > to use anycompatiblearray. This is a simple extension of commit > 5c292e6b9 to hit some other places where there's a pretty obvious > gain in usability from doing so. > > Ideally we'd also modify other functions taking multiple old-style > polymorphic arguments. But most of the remainder are tied into one > or more operator classes, making any such change a much larger can of > worms than I desire to open right now. > > Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/77675130-89da-dab1-51dd-492c93dcf5d1@postgresfriends.org > This patch broke cross-version pg_upgrade testing. I have cured crake for the moment by having it execute this in the source database: drop aggregate if exists public.array_cat_accum(anyarray); drop aggregate if exists public.first_el_agg_any(anyelement); But I wonder if we really want to make it impossible to upgrade databases with aggregates that contain these functions? cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: