Re: Unable to connect to PostgreSQL DB as root user when private key is owned by root with permission 640
| От | David Steele |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Unable to connect to PostgreSQL DB as root user when private key is owned by root with permission 640 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | ff6b518a-36bf-f400-39c6-a02a44650c4d@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Unable to connect to PostgreSQL DB as root user when private key is owned by root with permission 640 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Unable to connect to PostgreSQL DB as root user when private key is owned by root with permission 640
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 5/26/22 2:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> writes: >> On 5/24/22 16:05, Tom Lane wrote: >>> After further poking at this, I see that we also have to drop the check of >>> file ownership. That was already dropped once long ago (3405f2b9253), on >>> the grounds that if the file has suitable permissions but its ownership >>> isn't what we expect then our read attempt will fail, so we needn't check >>> ownership explicitly. While I'd prefer a more explicit error than the >>> "Permission denied" that you get with this approach, the intent of this >>> patch was not to create any new failure modes, so I think we're stuck >>> with that. > >> That makes sense. Seems I should have dug further into why the server >> does this but the client does not. > > Pushed that. Excellent. Thank you! >>> Open questions: >>> * This puts us back into a situation where the frontend and server tests >>> are not in sync. Do we want to relax the server's checks to match this, >>> or just leave that side as it stands? > >> I'm inclined to leave it as is in the back branches to avoid any other >> unintended consequences. Perhaps we could make the change for PG15? > > Yeah, I'm unenthused now about touching this in the back branches. > But do we want to do it in HEAD, or just leave well enough alone? After thinking on it for a bit I believe we should leave well enough alone. This code is rarely touched so I don't think it's a very big deal. Regards, -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: