Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster |
Дата | |
Msg-id | fece0003-6ede-ca8b-8f26-3c6fa899583d@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/20/17 5:04 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2017-02-20 11:58:12 +0100, Petr Jelinek wrote: >> That being said, I did wonder myself if we should just deprecate float >> timestamps as well. > > I think we need a proper deprecation period for that, given that the > conversion away will be painful for pg_upgrade using people with big > clusters. So I think we should fix this regardless... :( I wounder if a separate "floatstamp" data type might fit the bill there. It might not be completely seamless, but it would be binary compatible. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: