Re: [HACKERS] renaming "transaction log"
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] renaming "transaction log" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | fe26b296-168a-784f-8a10-db696bc5124d@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] renaming "transaction log" (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] renaming "transaction log"
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/2/17 9:09 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Most documentation and error messages still uses the term "transaction > log" to refer to the write-ahead log. Here is a patch to rename that, > which I think should be done, to match the xlog -> wal renaming in APIs. +1 for the idea. The documentation changes look good to me, but the error message changes are a random mix of "WAL" and "write-ahead log", even when referring to the same thing. For example: - errmsg("could not open transaction log directory \"%s\": %m", + errmsg("could not open write-ahead log directory \"%s\": %m", and: - fprintf(stderr, _("%s: failed to remove transaction log directory\n"), + fprintf(stderr, _("%s: failed to remove WAL directory\n"), It seems like they should be one or the other. I think "write-ahead log" is good in the documentation since it is more explanatory, but the error messages should either be all "write-ahead log" or all "WAL". Personally I favor "WAL" for brevity in the error messages, but I would be OK with "write-ahead log", too. -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: