Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | fdde4536-dd90-5f81-9c59-74f17da958e5@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/7/19 12:41 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > čt 7. 3. 2019 v 18:35 odesílatel Andrew Dunstan > <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com > <mailto:andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>> napsal: > > > > > The other thing that bugs me a bit about the patch is that the only > testing it does it to make sure that pragmas are ignored by the core > plpgsql processor. Maybe that's enough, but mostly we tend to like to > have one actual use of a feature. > > > Unfortunately plpgsql_check is not part of upstream > > https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_check > > I can to write some simple extension - some print tracing, that can > use this feature? > > Works for me. Another idea I had was some sort of crypto signature pragma. I still think making it block level only is unwarranted, though. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: