Re: Error-safe user functions

On 12/5/22 12:35, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 12:27 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I wrote:
>> > Nah, it's so close to ereport that it looks like a typo.  eseterr isn't
>> > awful, perhaps.  Or maybe errXXXX, but I've not thought of suitable XXXX.
>>
>> ... "errsave", maybe?
> 
> eseterr or errsave seem totally fine to me, FWIW.

+1

> I would probably choose a more verbose name if I were doing it, but I
> do get the point that keeping line lengths reasonable is important,
> and if someone were to accuse me of excessive prolixity, I would be
> unable to mount much of a defense.

prolixity -- nice word! I won't comment on its applicability to you in 
particular ;-P

-- 
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com