Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?

On 07/27/2017 11:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I kinda suspect we're not actively testing non-MULTIPLICITY builds
> either.  The 5.8.7 test I just ran was with a non-MULTIPLICITY build,
> so the case doesn't seem actively broken, but I doubt there is any
> buildfarm coverage.  I wonder if it'd be worth getting the buildfarm
> to log the output of "perl -V" so we could get a clearer picture
> of what's being tested.
>
It's quite possible, but in general it will need a new buildfarm client release. If you choose a few possibly critical
animalswe can ask the owners to apply a fairly simple patch.
 

cheers

andrew



-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services