Re: Grouping isolationtester tests in the schedule
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Grouping isolationtester tests in the schedule |
Дата | |
Msg-id | fd395399-84c0-94f3-087c-d3a82af5187f@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Grouping isolationtester tests in the schedule (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Grouping isolationtester tests in the schedule
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/08/2019 14:42, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:28 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote: >> The list of tests in src/test/isolation/isolation_schedule has grown >> over the years. Originally, they were all related to Serializable >> Snapshot Isolation, but there are different kinds of concurrency tests >> there now. More tests is good, but the schedule file has grown into a >> big inscrutable list with zero comments. > > +1 > >> I propose to categorize the tests and add some divider comments to the >> file, see attached. > > I think I'd put nowait and skip locked under a separate category "FOR > UPDATE" or "row locking" or something, but maybe that's just me... can > you call that stuff DML? Yeah, I guess SELECT FOR UPDATE isn't really DML. Separate "Row locking" category works for me. Or maybe "Concurrent DML and row locking". There is also DML in some of those tests. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: