Re: [HACKERS] DROP SUBSCRIPTION hangs if sub is disabled in the sametransaction
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] DROP SUBSCRIPTION hangs if sub is disabled in the sametransaction |
Дата | |
Msg-id | fcd89ae4-706c-65d5-b803-c84d0498b98b@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] DROP SUBSCRIPTION hangs if sub is disabled in the sametransaction (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] DROP SUBSCRIPTION hangs if sub is disabled in the sametransaction
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/13/17 09:56, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > >>> - Disallow DROP SUBSCRIPTION in a transaction under certain >>> circumstances, for example if a transaction has previously manipulated >>> the same subscription. > >> ISTM the second of those (refuse to drop an in-use subscription) is >> by far the least surprising behavior. > > +1 for that option. IIRC this has precedent for other object types such > as tables, where we refuse some action if we have already operated on > the table in the same transaction. What are some examples of such behavior? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: