Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user |
Дата | |
Msg-id | fca84a02124e1ffc7879dd0e5c7c2c7e@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > In light of the proposed purging scheme, how would it be able to distinguish > between those two cases (nothing there yet vs. was there but purged)? > There is a difference between an empty result set and an exception. No, I meant how will the *function* know, if a superuser and/or some background process can purge records at any time? - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/ PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201005240928 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkv6f0UACgkQvJuQZxSWSsh0xwCgmXLtKngoBBYX0TxDM2TlJRId AVIAoMHYa3c9Ej2vUJyFufxBR5vDPzQ+ =e1mh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: