Re: Regarding SSL Enablement in PostgreSQL Database on different port
От | Tomas Pospisek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Regarding SSL Enablement in PostgreSQL Database on different port |
Дата | |
Msg-id | fc7edc62-79f8-74c5-cfb8-08ddca84d32b@sourcepole.ch обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Regarding SSL Enablement in PostgreSQL Database on different port (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Regarding SSL Enablement in PostgreSQL Database on different port
Re: Regarding SSL Enablement in PostgreSQL Database on different port |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 02.05.23 12:13, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 11:43 AM sujay kadam <sujaykadam02@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi PostgreSQL Team, >> >> >> I want to enable SSL in PostgreSQL Database on a new port. >> >> I don’t want the default port that is 5432 SSL enabled, but I want to configure another port to enable SSL on it. >> >> As per my requirement, I cannot use the same port for normal connection and SSL connection. >> >> Hence, we require a new port to be SSL enabled. >> >> >> Please guide us with proper information and links to achieve the above task. > > That is now how SSL in PostgreSQL works. It will always run on the > same port, and PostgreSQL will only listen on one port. > > You can probably do some hacky solution to it by running something > like pgbouncer on a different port and enable SSL only in that one. > But it will be a hack. I would recommend instead reviewing your > requirements and see if you can make them work with how PostgreSQL is > designed. Oh, I think your idea to use pgbouncer to take care of the SSL termination is elegant. I don't think me I'd characterize it as a hack if properly set up. Why do you consider it a hack? *t
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: