Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark"
От | Guido Neitzer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | fbbe50e0609230600q1c9750a8nd45eeefc5f786e4f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark" (mark@mark.mielke.cc) |
Ответы |
Re: Opteron vs. Xeon "benchmark"
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
I find the benchmark much more interesting in comparing PostgreSQL to MySQL than Intel to AMD. It might be as biased as other "benchmarks" but it shows clearly something that a lot of PostgreSQL user always thought: MySQL gives up on concurrency ... it just doesn't scale well. cug On 9/23/06, mark@mark.mielke.cc <mark@mark.mielke.cc> wrote: > Yep. From what I understand, Intel is 8 to 10 times the size of AMD. > > It's somewhat amazing that AMD even competes, and excellent for us, the > consumer, that they compete well, ensuring that we get very fast > computers, for amazingly low prices. > > But Intel isn't crashing down any time soon. Perhaps they became a little > lazy, and made a few mistakes. AMD is forcing them to clean up. > > May the competition continue... :-) > > Cheers, > mark -- PostgreSQL Bootcamp, Big Nerd Ranch Europe, Nov 2006 http://www.bignerdranch.com/news/2006-08-21.shtml
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: