Re: number and type of locks for an alter sequence
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: number and type of locks for an alter sequence |
Дата | |
Msg-id | fb6f46f1-3f05-4f7a-2c39-74d6225f4c43@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | number and type of locks for an alter sequence (Thomas Poty <thomas.poty@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 1/28/19 6:07 AM, Thomas Poty wrote: > Hello , > > In PG10, when I am altering a sequence, i see 2 locks in pg_locks > matching my sequence: > a RowExclusiveLock > and a ShareRowExclusiveLock > > My question is Why 2 locks? > Someone on irc said it was for catalog but i am no sure because > pg_locks.relationid is the same for the 2 locks. > > At the same time, If I am trying to call nextval with an othersession, > the session wants to get a RowExclusiveLock on the sequence. > > So, to me, the lock ShareRowExclusiveLock is when the sequence is beeing > altered. > And the RowExclusiveLock is for concurent access between alter/drop > sequence and nextval/setval/curval/lastval. > > Documentation seems not talking about this... > (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/explicit-locking.html) Maybe should > I open a ticket? A sequence, for practical purposes, is a table. So in the above substitute TABLE with SEQUENCE: > > Thanks -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: