Re: transactional DDL
| От | Lukas Kahwe Smith |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: transactional DDL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | f9u500$2253$1@news.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: transactional DDL (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: transactional DDL
|
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Greg Smith wrote: > There is now is a discussion of the benefits of PostgreSQL's > transactional DDL abilities on the otherwise deprecated page at Somewhat related ALTER TABLE in MySQL is actually a copy+drop, which obviously is quite costly and time consuming. This is why they can offer the convenience of allowing you to decide where to place a column in an existing table. This in turn is something that ActiveRecord implementations love, because they default to using the column order in their view presentation. Which means a lot of people perceive this as a missing feature in PostgreSQL. regards, Lukas
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: