Re: TODO: GNU TLS
От | Jochem van Dieten |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f96a9b830612290059k55f12543p3aeb03f655f84b75@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TODO: GNU TLS (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: TODO: GNU TLS
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/29/06, Stephen Frost wrote: > > So, Debian is distributing an application (exim4 w/ libpq & libssl) > which includes GPL code (exim4) combined with code under another license > (BSD w/ advertising clause) which *adds additional restrictions* (the > advertising clause) over those in the GPL, which is against the terms of > the GPL. It's *Debian's* problem, but *PostgreSQL* can solve it by > providing the option to link against GNUTLS instead. > In the case above, exim4 *can* provide an exception because it's the > *GPL* of *exim4* which is being violated by the advertising clause in > the *OpenSSL* license. Which exim4 upstream has *done*, and which can > be seen in their license (linked to previously in this thread). Considering that the problem is caused by the choice for a license so restrictive it prohibits linking to OpenSSL, I think a license exception in said restrictive license is exactly the right way for Debian to solve their problem. Jochem
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: