Re: PostgreSQL 13 Beta 1 Release Announcement Draft
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL 13 Beta 1 Release Announcement Draft |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f83748bd-b411-562e-2f6c-bf0c7ba15619@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL 13 Beta 1 Release Announcement Draft (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 5/20/20 4:30 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Hello, sorry for the timing on this, but here's some feedback. > > On 2020-May-20, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > > >> One of the most anticipated features of PostgreSQL 13 is the ability for the >> `VACUUM` command to process indexes in parallel. This functionality can be >> accessed using the new `PARALLEL` option on the `VACUUM` command (or >> `--parallel` on `vacuumdb`), which allows you to specify the number of parallel >> workers to use for vacuuming indexes. Note that this does not work with the >> `FULL` option. > > I feel this "Note" is unnecessary; VACUUM FULL is of fringe use anyway. You would hope so, but given the number of times it shows up on --general I would say the note is important. > The phrase on incremental sorting above is better use of these extra > words, if you have a surplus. > > Thanks! > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: