Re: parallel index creation: maintenance_work_mem not honored?
От | Fabio Pardi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: parallel index creation: maintenance_work_mem not honored? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f815f4b2-d49f-434b-b3de-d204605de49f@portavita.eu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: parallel index creation: maintenance_work_mem not honored? (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: parallel index creation: maintenance_work_mem not honored?
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Thanks for the clarification Peter, On 21/06/2022 08:46, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > >> But why the temp files are always on disk and not in RAM as other operations do? > Why not? Systems running on slow disks will probably suffer from workers writing temp files to disk. > It is probably true that it would be better to use shared memory in > the case where there is sufficient memory, but it's not all that > significant compared to everything else that must happen at the same > time. It's rarely the bottleneck. External sorts are often faster than > internal sorts. That happens because they can be more CPU cache > friendly, for reasons that aren't fundamental. > I would expect this behavior to be mentioned in the documentation. regards, fabio pardi
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: