Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source
От | Guido Barosio |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f7f6b4c70809091102p1b490afofe3d4acb9cc33529@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source (Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Binaries vs Source
|
Список | pgsql-www |
Joshua, *... a surprise to me* ---> Though *compile* would beat other methods. gb.- On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:42:51 -0700 > "Guido Barosio" <gbarosio@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Binary package from www.postgresql.org 121 33.799% >> Through operating system update tool 127 35.475% >> ~66% >> >> Compile from source 98 27.374% >> >> Hmmm, are we doing something with this information? I am not an expert >> at all, but I reccon that these numbers are at least a surprise to me. >> > > Why is it a surprise? > > -- > The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ > PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ > United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ > Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate > > > -- Guido Barosio ----------------------- http://www.globant.com guido.barosio@globant.com
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: