Re: [HACKERS] SUBSCRIPTIONS and pg_upgrade

On 13/04/17 18:11, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 4/12/17 18:31, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On 4/11/17 23:41, Noah Misch wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:21:24PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>>> On 4/9/17 22:16, Noah Misch wrote:
>>>>>> [Action required within three days.  This is a generic notification.]
>>>>>
>>>>> Patches have been posted.  Discussion is still going on a bit.
>>>>
>>>> By what day should the community look for your next update?
>>>
>>> tomorrow
>>
>> Everything has been committed, and this thread can be closed.
> 
> I wonder if we should have an --no-subscriptions option, now that they
> are dumped by default, just like we have --no-blobs, --no-owner,
> --no-password, --no-privileges, --no-acl, --no-tablespaces, and
> --no-security-labels.  It seems like there is probably a fairly large
> use case for excluding subscriptions even if you have sufficient
> permissions to dump them.
> 

+1, I'll look into writing patch for that

--  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services