[PATCH] Add overlaps geometric operators that ignore point overlaps
От | Ankit Kumar Pandey |
---|---|
Тема | [PATCH] Add overlaps geometric operators that ignore point overlaps |
Дата | |
Msg-id | f7772fc2-1833-f3ab-b955-0b47bc0954a2@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Add overlaps geometric operators that ignore point overlaps
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, This is patch for todo item: Add overlaps geometric operators that ignore point overlaps Issue: SELECT circle '((0,0), 1)' && circle '((2,0),1) returns True Expectation: In above case, both figures touch other but do not overlap (i.e. touching != overlap). Hence, it should return false. Cause: Less than or equal check between distance of center and sum of radius Datum circle_overlap(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) { CIRCLE *circle1 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0); CIRCLE *circle2 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1); PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPle(point_dt(&circle1->center, &circle2->center), float8_pl(circle1->radius, circle2->radius))); } Possible fix: # Don't check for <= , just < would suffice. Datum circle_overlap(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) { CIRCLE *circle1 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(0); CIRCLE *circle2 = PG_GETARG_CIRCLE_P(1); PG_RETURN_BOOL(FPlt(point_dt(&circle1->center, &circle2->center), float8_pl(circle1->radius, circle2->radius))); } same for boxes as well. Results: Before: select box '((0,0),(1,1))' && box '((0,1), (1,2))'; ?column? ---------- t (1 row) With patch: select box '((0,1),(1,1))' && box '((1,1), (1,2))'; ?column? ---------- f (1 row) Bring box slightly ( > EPSILON) inside the other box select box '((0,0),(1,1.0001))' && box '((0,1), (1,2))'; ?column? ---------- t (1 row) similar for circle. Now, as per as discussion (https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20100322175532.GG26428%40fetter.org) and corresponding change in docs, https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/functions-geometry.html, it mentions `Do these objects overlap? (One point in common makes this true.) `. Does this means current behavior is correct? Or do we still need the proposed change (if so, with proper updates in docs)? If current behavior is correct, this todo item might need some update (unless I missed anything) otherwise any suggestion is welcomed. Also, I did some search around this and there is general sense of differentiation between overlap and touch of geometric figures. I am not able to find any function which can determine if two geometric figures touch each other at a point (and if there is real use case of this). In any case, patch attached for a reference. Any feedback is welcomed. -- Regards, Ankit Kumar Pandey
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: